STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

6,916 articles

Blair v. EMC MORTGAGE, LLC | Ind: Court of Appeals - EMC waited an unreasonable time to accelerate its Note and Mortgage. By doing so and by failing to make demand within a reasonable time, its rights are time-barred.

06/18/2019

Dean Blair and Paula Blair, Appellants/Cross-Appellees-Defendants/Counterclaimants, v. EMC Mortgage, LLC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant-Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant. No. 18A-MF-808.Court of Appeals of Indiana.June 12, 2019.Appeal from the Vanderburgh Superior Court

Read More

GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC v. 21st MORTGAGE CORPORATION | FL 2DCA - 21st Mortgage failed to present legally sufficient evidence of the amount due. We reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an order of involuntary dismissal, which was the remedy Green Emerald properly sought in the trial court.

06/13/2019

GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC, Appellant, v. 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in Florida, Appellee. Case No. 2D17-2192.District Court of Appeal

Read More

Henderson v. COPPER RIDGE HOMES, LLC, | MISSISSIPPI SC - Finding that the trial court erred in granting Copper Ridge's and First Bank's post-foreclosure motions for dismissal of the Hendersons' claims, the Court affirms the grant ofjudicial foreclosure, reverses the grant of summary judgment to both parties, and remands the case to the trial court for determination of the Hendersons' claims.

06/11/2019

H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES CINDY HENDERSON AND JOHN HENDERSON, v. COPPER RIDGE HOMES, LLC, RICHARD CONEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND FIRST BANK, A MISSISSIPPI BANKING CORPORATION. No.

Read More

Note Capital Group, Inc. v. Perretta | RI SC - the Perrettas contend that Note Capital was not entitled to enforce the note because the chain of title to the note was tainted by an improper transfer... that Note Capital was not entitled to enforce the note secured by a mortgage on their property because the note had been lost by the previous holder of the note, American Residential Equities, LIX, LLC (ARELIX),2 prior to the assignment of the mortgage to Note Capital

06/11/2019

H/T DUBIN LAW OFFICES 2019-17-7 by DinSFLA on Scribd

Read More

BOGDEN v. CITIGROUP, INC., | Cal: Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dist. - Bogden argues that her attorney's declaration was sufficient under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) to justify mandatory relief from the dismissal of her action against defendants and respondents Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citi Residential Lending, Inc., CitiMortgage Inc., Associates First Capital Corp. and CR Title Services (collectively, Citibank). We agree and reverse.

06/04/2019

DIANA BOGDEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITIGROUP, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B278352.Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.Filed May 30,

Read More
Previous109 / 315Next