Amstone v. The Bank of New York Mellon | Therefore, genuine issues of material fact remained, summary judgment should not have been entered, and we must reverse for further proceedings. .... We conclude that the Bank did prove standing but failed to refute the Amstones' affirmative defenses

in STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

 Amstone v. The Bank of New York Mellon (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

View original: From the court   |   Our backup   . . . Charles and Carolyn Amstone appeal the final summary judgment of foreclosure entered against them and in favor of The Bank of New York Mellon. The Amstones argue that the Bank failed to show that it had standing to foreclose and failed to refute their affirmative defenses. They claim that summary judgment should have been granted in their favor. We conclude that the Bank did prove standing but failed to refute the Amstones' affirmative defenses. Therefore, genuine issues of material fact remained, summary judgment should not have been entered, and we must reverse for further proceedings.